Wow tal oakks was subfbdahfdafdsf cool. I am not
a professional writer.
Jeffrey MacIntyre writes a great post pointing out gaping hole in current Web design.
Content strategy needs to get past its “dark continent” reputation, or live forevermore as the here-be-dragons squiggle on the edge of the user experience design map.
IN-sane. But props to this dude’s passion.
Who throws a shoe? Honestly!That almost really hurt!
January 8, 2009
Now entering Hulu: please leave pwns at the door
XKCD: A Web Comic of Romance, Sarcasm, Math, and Language.
Comment threads and discussion forums tend to be the Internet’s 1st Grade classroom. YouTube’s comments are a 1st Grade classroom that’s into Metal and just read “F*ck Your F*ggot GAY n00b P*ssy: New Ways to Insult Strangers.”
In comparison to YouTube’s 1st Graders, Hulu’s users are working on their Master’s. Their conversations spur discussion and thought, without cries of FRST!, PWNED, or FAG! Related to shows or episodes, and styled in a minimalistic look, the forum doesn’t functionally do many things differently. You can post a new topic, reply to topics, or reply to replies.
But somehow Hulu’s discussions are filled with even tempered, supportive conversations. On the Dec. 9, 2008 episode of the Daily Show, Jon Stewart and Mike Huckabee had a wonderfully even tempered discussion about gay marriage.
Following that video, several topics about gay marriage were posted on Hulu.
Even the arguments were intelligent.
And there were plenty of arguments.
But nobody got called a fag.
Any sort of posting on YouTube would create chaos.
On A List Apart, Caroyln Wood warned against belligerent commenting in her article Putting our Hot Heads Together.
It’s a good suggestion, but doesn’t examine what creates more productive comment/forum environments. Although, A List Apart is another example of intelligent comments. Users tend to add depth to articles, and authors often reply; this creates an interactive dialogue on the Internet. What a concept! A List Apart actively tries to maintain this kind of environment, though. Instead of letting users immediately comment on an article, A List Apart offers a “Join the Discussion” link.
Oh, A List Apart. It's always good for me.
This wording accomplishes two tasks:
As Hulu gains popularity I’ll be interested to see how its discussions evolve. I can’t help but wonder if a simple shift from “comment” to “discuss” would alter YouTube’s environment. Or if it would take a greater reorganization of the site’s structure to encourage actual conversations. Since you can’t start new topics under a specific video on YouTube, commenting tends to feel pointless. On top of that, the sheer volume of comments makes a dialogue nearly impossible to track. It’s like shouting inside a tornado that’s picked up the YouTube 1st Grade classroom having a food fight: nobody’s gonna hear you, and you’ll probably get smacked in the face with meatloaf, even though you didn’t throw anything in the first place.
Hulu, on the other hand, makes users create topics for their discussions. Making users write headlines for their comments forces them to focus what they want to say. I’d argue that this extra moment makes them write with more care. Establishing topics also let users scroll through discussions more quickly, choosing when to participate.
It’s the difference between a trash dump that puts everything in one pile and a recycling center that sorts materials. One smells like shit, and the other helps the Earth. Which one would you rather visit?
2 Comments
Filed under Social Media, Web Theory
Tags: a list apart, comments, forum, gay marriage, hulu, jon stewart, jonas brothers, metallica, mike huckabee, the daily show, youtube